|
|
[ Summary ] [ Syllabus] [Bibliography & Resources] [Blog] |
||
| Course Summary |
||
|
Course Number: COMM ST 395-0 Sec. 23 |
Professor Justine Cassell |
|
|
Format: Course Requirements: Class participation: This is not a lecture class and so your participation is invited - nay, expected. But note the definition of class participation: being willing and able to speak intelligently in class about the topics under discussion. Clearly, in order to be able to speak intelligently about a topic, you will need to have done the readings and attended the lab for that topic. You will also need to be physically present and alert, both for class and for the lab sessions. . . Interpretive questions: Before each class meeting students are required to submit at least two interpretive and motivated questions for the readings assigned for that class. Since the point of the questions is (a) to demonstrate that you have done the readings, and (b) to give the instructor a roadmap for class discussion, your questions cannot be both about the same reading. You can write one question for each of two different texts, or one question that compares two texts, and one question on a third text, or two questions that compare three texts, and so forth. Questions must be posted to the class blog on Monday and on Wednesday by noon (24 hours before the class meets), so that the instructor can base her discussion of the readings on the questions submitted. Occasionally I may cancel the question requirement in favor of another equally straightforward and non time-consuming assignment. Due each class period Observe a child: Find some real children, watch them engaging in some activity, and write up an transcript of your observations. You can either structure your observations around a topic that interests you (such as, "differences in play patterns between same-sex and mixed sex peers", or "how children actually use action figures") or an interesting children's activity (such as "juice time", "storytime", "bedtime"). Note that the goal of the assignment is (a) to get you to distinguish between observation and interpretation; (b) to give you some data on real children. Thus, your goal is to observe everything that goes on and write it down without interpretation (a tape recorder or videocamera will help a lot!). What to turn in: The transcript of your observations (what the kids said & did) and 1-2 pages on how you interpret their behavior based on one or more of the class readings. Due January 22nd. Analyze a children's artifact: Choose a game, toy, program, book, or other artifact for children and analyze (in 1-2 pages) the representation of childhood that it explicitly or implicitly conveys/ instantiates / relies on; a 3rd page should provide an annotated bibliography of a minimum of 3references that influenced your interpretation (grad students are to supply 6 references). You will be bringing the artifact in to share with the class. Due February 5th. Critical Essay: Undergraduates (7-10 Pages); Graduate Students (15 Pages). Students should develop a topic in consultation with the professor which allows them to apply some of the theoretical and conceptual materials from the course to explore some aspect of contemporary children's culture. Due February 24th. Produce a children's artifact: Produce/construct/implement a game, toy, program, book, or other artifact for children. Examples include: writing a children's story, implementing a video game, building a children's toy, filming a segment of a children's show. Then write 3-4 pages about the underlying assumptions about children/childhood that are pre-supposed by your artifact, along with an annotated bibliography consisting of at least 8 references (grad students are to supply 12 references) that have influenced your development of this artifact. You will be bringing the artifact in to present to the class. Due March 11th. Required Books: For your shopping convenience, we have made links to all necessary books on Amazon.com. The remaining readings will be linked to the website, in pdf format. Justine Cassell and Henry Jenkins (Ed.) From
BarbieŽ to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games Grading Policy: Interpretive questions and class participation will be graded with a check mark for each class meeting, to indicate that the requirement was met. Late interpretive questions will be accepted once during the semester, no questions asked, provided they are turned in before the following class meeting. Other than this, please note that all work must be turned in on time, no late work will be accepted.Do not even think of asking for an extension in the following cases: 1) you have a lot of tests or papers in other classes that week; 2) you will be away on the day the assignment is due, 3) a last-minute emergency. Assignments are given well in advance, and just because you planned to write the paper the night before but got food poisoning is not an excuse for not turning in your paper on time! The other assignments will be assigned letter grades. The term paper and final children's artifact are each worth 25% of your grade. The children's observation, and analysis of artifact are worth 15% of your grade each. The interpretive questions and class participation are worth 10% each (and may also serve to bump up or down grades that are on the edge). The critical essay will be graded on both content and form. Content means the originality and interest of the research question, nature of the methodology used to investigate the question, plausibility of your interpretations. Form means the organization, clarity and quality of the writing, and the scholarly use of conventions such as citations and footnotes. An 'A' quality term paper finds an interesting research question in contemporary children's culture, makes use of primary and secondary sources to address the question, and adds interesting and original interpretations of the author's own. It is well-organized and clearly and professionally written. You will be encouraged to carry out the observation, analysis and construction assignments in groups. However, each student must turn in a report that is recognizeably his or her own work. In order to make sure that your collaboration falls within the Northwestern guidelines of academic integrity, please read : http://www.northwestern.edu/uacc/ and in particular, http://www.northwestern.edu/uacc/plagiar.html. |
||